
Recently, I got a chance to talk to the leader of a Shan Group campaigning for a
totally Independent Shan State. His name is Tiger Yawnghwe or His Royal Highness
Prince Hso Khan Pha; he is the eldest son of Sao Shwe Thaik, the former
Saopha[Prince] of Yawnghwe[Nyaung-Shwe] and the first President of Burma after
Burma's Independence from British colonial rule.
In the following excerpts I'll refer him as 'Sao Hso', and me 'Tayza'.
Sao Hso... "My family have been inolved with the founding of the Union of Burma in 1948 and the Panglong Conferences that culminated in the signing of the Panglong Agreement in 1947 - the basis for the foundation of the Union that was so rudely destroyed in 1962 by Ne Win."
Tayza..."I'm really glad to get a chance to know a descendent of our first President of independent Burma."
Sao Hso... "Might I add that the problem
that exist is not ethic "minority" rights versus the "majority" Burmese rights
but rather of equality of rights for all.
The 1948 Union of Burma was understood by us to be a federal union of
equals. And though the intent of the 1948 Constitution was federal,
in rushing it through the Constituent Assembly by the AFPFL[Fa-sa-pa-la], the
federal Union in practice became unitary.
When we during 1958-62 tried to institute constitutional reforms in the Union
Parliament towards a more equitable federal system as envisaged by the 1947
Panglong Agreement, Ne Win staged his military coup and he and his
successor Burmese military troops in Shan country raped, murdered
& tortured to oppress, suppress and intimidate."
Tayza... "I support all ethnic groups'
rights to have their own federal states, probably in US style or Canadian style.
I understand that Quebac Province in Canada is an autonomic federal state. Shan
state can be like that?
I never believe that "total separation of Union of Burma/Myanmar into a large
number of totally separated & independent but very small tiny little
countries" might be a wise decision."
Sao Hso... "Yugoslavia did break up into
its components parts and theorectically there is no reason why the former
and defunct Union - made so by successive Burmese military regimes
could not do the same. The Shan States are larger both in population then
Cambodia for instance and larger in area than some 24 States of the US and
20 or so Nation-States in Europe.
The Shan & Karenni has every right to secceed and so guaranteed in the 1948
Constitution. There is another alternative that we have - we could form a
federal union - United States of Southeast Asia or Southeast Asian Union a la EU
with out the Burmese for example. But the Shan could certainly go it
alone
Shan is a Burmese rendering of Siam as you know, & the Thai call us Thai-yai
or Elder Thai - and Tai or Thai is only a dialectical rendering. The Tai
Speaking Peoples stretch from NE India, through Burma, the Kachin and Shan
States, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam and south and southwest China -
Premier Chou-en-lai of PRC[Communist Mainland China] said in 1957 to my parents
that in China there were then 100million Tai/Dai Speaking Peoples in
China.
For myself, I believe we all should talk - as Winston Churchill said "jaw jaw is
better than war war". Some of us feel uncomfortable in talking heart to heart
with Burmese who often become belligerent and abusive."
Tayza... "Although Shans can join with either Burmese or Thais or Chinese, I think it would be better to go on joining with Burmese; my idea is why would you topple the apple cart. We should sort out problems between ourselves, Shans and Burmese, rather than engaging with Thais/Chinese, it will just make matters more complicated."
Sao Hso... "Indeed we had high hopes too in
1947 and expected to have occupation & conflicts behind us and to avoid the
sort of fighting and bloody killings that took place between 1812-19 when the
Burmese kings of Mandalay tried to conquer and subdue the Shan Ahom kingdom in
Assam where the Burmese general Maha Bandula's troops committed undescribable
cruelties and barbarities as to dessimate something like 2/3 of the
population and certainly 1/3 of the men and boys - disemboweling them, eating
their flesh and burning them alive in cages to intimidate and suppress the Shan
Ahom of Assam ref: History of Assam by Sir Edward Gaits. This event so
weakened and disorganised the Shan Ahom that by 1839 the kingdom was completely
annexed by the British. Before that from about 1220 - 1812 AD they maintained
themselves under one Dynasty, (that of Mong Mao 568-1604 AD when its
descendants ruled Hsenwi or Theinni in Burmese). Indeed the Shan Ahom resisted
conquest by the Mughals who had conquered much of India before the British
incursion.
We are now in the 21st century, not 200 years ago.
After WWII we had hoped to avoid bloodshed and war - and invasion by the Burma
Independence Army under Aung San, an army that had been trained and arrmed
by the Japanese while we had no army at all except police forces. The British
told my father to expect no assistance whatever should the BIA under Aung San
invade the Shan States and that they advised us Shan to make the best deal
we could - hence the 1947 Panglong Agreement or Treaty. And I
might add that the Chin, Kachin & Karenni agreed to the Union because the
Shan had. Unfortunately as it turned out we merely delayed invasion
and occupation by the Burmese Army by 14 year to 1962.
These are issues that are not easily resolved and after nearly half a
century of being raped, tortured and murdered can you honestly say that a
battered spouse of either sex cannot sue for divorce but must grin and bear in
the hope that the abuser is going to miraculously change and become
an angel? And under these existing conditions - the grass looks certainly
greener on the other side. A magic wand cannot be waved to wishfully make
things better.
Wishful thinking resolves nothing and to solve any problem we need to look
at all angles and discuss all issues pleasant and unpleasant.
Tayza... "If we are a family, I think, the
oppressed burmese children and the bullied Shan mother should join hands to
fight against the bullying military man in their House/Home.
I won't want my mother to leave our family and marry a Chinese stranger or a
Thai neighbour.
Anyway, thanks to your kind and patient explanation about the background history
of your Shans' struggles, I got a lot of insight on some very important
historical aspects which happened long before I was born."
Sao Hso... "It is truly encouraging to
discuss matters of common interest, and it is only through honest
discussions like these that real understanding and mutual respect will
blossom.
I declared Shan independence on the wish and will of the majority of the
Shan people - people in 48 of 56 Se-Viengs or Townships of the Shan States voted
for Independence following a secret balloting that took 5 years to complete and
47 years after we had the Constitutional Right to Secceed. Thus this decision
was not taken lightly or hastily. In 1947 at Panglong, the vote to form a
Union and join with Burma was only narrowly won after a long and heated debate -
the very narrow majority won the day and the minority who lost
by a hair's breath conceded and obeyed the rules of parliamentary
democracy - this is something the Burmese generals are loathed to do. And
because the Shan agreed, the Chin, Kachin and Karenni followed suite.
The final say rests with the Shan People but looking at it objectively, we
have many options: -
1. Confirm our Independence.
2. Form a United States of Southeast Asia - USSA with
the Arakan, Chin, Kachin, Karenni, Mon & Karen.
3. Form an EU like grouping with the above partners,
SEAU.
4.Negotiate a totally new federal
union of equal partners to include the Burmese or Burma State - with
effective safeguards so that we do not have a repeat of the Ne
Win-BSPP/SLORC/SPDC dictatorship; and with a totally new name.
5. Join with our Thai brothers.
6. Join with our Lao brothers.
7. Form a Thai-Tai-Lao, Tai Speakjng Peoples Union.
8. Form an association with
China.
What is happening today under the Burmese generals is real
and not merely an academic or intellectual speculation; and nearly half a
century of oppression and inhuman cruelty that is still on-going as we speak
cannot ever be forgotten, though in time may be forgiven."
Tayza... "Here I'd like to send my, rather
late, condolences for the great lady Maha Davi, your mother, who passed away in
2003 and for the great Shan leader, your brother, who passed away last
year.
And I also want to remind you a small point, with due respect. As you know, your
grand father Saopha Sao Maung once got in a very difficult position and Burmese
King helped him out. Right?"
Sao Hso... "Yes I am aware of the help
given by Mindon Min when he became king, to Saopha* (Sir) Moung and his mother
when his father Sao Suu Deva the Kye-Mong (Crown Prince) of Yawnghwe was
assissanated by a rival half sibbling who supported Pagan Min and whose
sister was Pagan Min's Queen. I am also aware that Saopha Sao Maung
opposed the Limbin Confederacy and that he employed many of Thibaw Min's
ex-Ministers in the Yawnghwe Administration after Thibaw went into exile.
This was why my father felt that he could work with the Burmese and with
General Aung San. But as events are to show in 1962, disastriously
as it turned out for us , my father's hope and trust was
betrayed - he was put in Insein Prison in March '62 as everyone knows, and
he died that November in prison under questionable circumstances and
one of his young sons not yet 17 was murdered by Burmese troops on our front
doorsteps in Rangoon on the night of the coup.
My mother, as a former vocal Member of Parliament would have been arrested
too had she not been in England for medical reasons at the time. On
returning to Rangoon in November 1962 to cremate my father she had
to flee for her life early in January 1963 on being warned that the
Women's Prison was being readied for her and she fled to Thailand together
with two of my sisters and a brother, with the assistance of the Karen
Resistance. Arriving there, the King of Thailand, on hearing of her sent
an emissary to extend to her and her children his personal
protection."
Tayza... "I understand your mother founded and led Shan State Army, and after her retirement your brother carried on leading SSA, right? But nowaday, there are two main Shan Armies SSA & SSNA. And they are just very recently saying that they will unitedly support a federal state, while you are calling for an Independent State. It's a little bit confusing, isn't it?
Sao Hso... "As for the recent merger
of the SSAS & SSNA and what they said is really no cause for
confusion. It is ultimately the will of the People that matters and both these
two worthy Commanders do not question the primacy of the civilian
authority of the Shan People whom they have sworn to serve. "
*** Sao
Hso has his own ideas and I have my own. You, the visitor to this website, might
have your own opinions. If you want to make comments to me, please click here.